Hey Steffen,
Great read! I'm not totally in the same book and on the same pages. But generally you speak the truth! once in awhile I speak to groups of students, who'll soon be part of the sad statistic you mention. Until now I've focused on "practicality over theory", networking and "Choose your focus". These things goes some what hand in hand with your agenda. And I can easily see how I can sharpen my previous speeches by borrowing from your blog post.
I like your Athlete-Developer analogy, since it's easy to understand, but IMO it doesn't necessarily fit that well. The main reason the two careers can't be put side by side like that is because of the whole theory vs practicality. Let's say Tiger Woods father made his son spend all that precious time hitting golf balls year in and year out, and after 15 years of stubbornness he realizes that his son sucks at sports. Then those years of learning would be hard to apply any where else... If little Tiger Woods instead was send to a standard school, learning standard things, ending up nerding a computer science education at the local university, cause he likes LoL, CS, WoW and TF2. After those years in school he finds him self in an industry where he's not good enough, what to do? Well IMO with a degree on the sheets he should have an ok shot at getting into some other industry...
[that said, I still have a firm believe that being a talented, or maybe just semi-talented game developer, actually can help you on many other career paths]
To follow up on this, which might open discussion on its own, I'll pull in a quote from your blog post:
You have a huge disadvantage if you start asking these questions after your education, and yes! – the educations can to some degree be blamed for not giving you an accurate idea of what’s expected, making you focus 80%+ of your time on theory instead of learning how you actually do things (which is why a huge part of game students end up starting their “Real game education” after the university).
During my own time at university I wanted more practical work, mainly because I'm not much a theoretician. But just because a few industries calls for people with more practical experience, we can't go change one of the very fundamentals of our educational system. The universities represent research, academic approaches and theoretical discussions. I'm sure that some middle ground between the universities and the more practical oriented institutions can become, but I think that we should be careful blaming(sry Steffen, It sounds a bit like blame) the universities for maintaining what I'd refer to as: integrity
Any way, my 5 cents.
/ Peter Buchardt